Search results

Jon. Grrrrr.

And not just because you like arguing? ;)

Peterson is a psychologist himself, obviously. I would expect him to have studied Jung and Freud - that's where all psychologists begin. Not everything Jung and Freud determined is incorrect, but there are large tracts of Jungian and Freudian teachings which have been superseded - or applied...

Your Jungian Type Indicator will have predicted that: a) you don't find overlaps a problem, and b) you are highly disagreeable ;)

That's my point. The overlaps are many and the definitions clouded.

That was the conversation I was having on Christmas night. From what I recall, it's something to do with the pairings of the indicators. Each pair of indicators is supposed to be the opposite end of a continuum. So to establish your Jungian Type, the Myers-Briggs test evaluates whether you will...

I'm saying that his thinking when he was fresh out of uni with his undergrad degree and no work experience in his chosen field, is different to his thinking 40 years on, with several post grad degrees.

No, it was very early in his career.

Haha - yes. It's because Myers-Briggs is based on the Jung type indicators. You get my point?

Jung has largely been debunked by academics however. In fact, I had a conversation with my ex-next-door neighbour on Christmas night about this very topic. He's a Professor of Psychology and runs his own business doing personality type testing and has worked with the likes of Isabel...

You may vote or not vote. But you'll have to leave the house if you do vote.

When I am Dictator, I will put people to death for spoiling votes. It just irritates the Count Supervisor (ie me).

Jon, you are a silly-billy sometimes. Show me any election that has been decided by a single vote and I'll buy you dinner.

I am less inclined towards censorship - but things that are illegal shouldn't be freely available. And really, I worry about porn more than anything because of the very unreal expectations it sets up for both girls and boys. That said, I'm not a fan of banning porn either - but I'd feel more...

Going back to my original point, what about the privacy of all of the people I've interacted with online? So, let's say I have a text message conversation with Doc. That conversation is both mine - and his. So it appears on both our phones (I know you don't have a smartphone, Doc, it's just...

I am, yes. But that's not the question I'm asking. A close friend of mine died 6 years ago. Her FB account is still live, curated by her widower. It catches me out to see posts from it from time to time. But that's my issue. Do the dead have rights over how their data is used?

My top tip is not to focus so much on weight, but to take your measurements. You will see a difference in your measurements even if the scales don't appear to be budging.

There is something though about what should happen to our data after we die. Should it be wiped? Or are our phones the modern-day equivalent of journals or diaries? Let's say I did something notable in life - should some future researcher be able to access my phone/data to gain an insight into...

It's not so much about how easy it is, but about how much time I will have. So, I'm starting small and hoping to win big!

How's it going? Do you know how it's been received on AWF? When I log on here, there seem to be more visitors - but I don't know if they are bots or the same people returning (and lurking).